Commission in Germany propagates new Militarism and Interventionism The Green Party -The Most Decided Protagonist
The content of its proposals is the complete transformation of the Bundeswehr into an army for international interventions, which is brought about by virtually abolishing the compulsory military service and using the resources which are thus made available for the corresponding armament and training. The Bundeswehr, according to the ideas of the commission, is to be reduced to 210 000 professional soldiers, resp. temporary professionals, with an appendix of just 30 000 conscripts which only can be named a symbolic one. No less than 140 000 of these 240 000 men are to be formed into 'crisis reaction forces for foreign actions'. Up to now these were 50 000, and the conscripts were still 135 000. This is a policy which aims at
completely functionalising the Bundeswehr according to the strategy of
international terrorization and intervention led by US-imperialism under
the cover of "human rights", the enormous increase of the share of the
intervention forces pointing to the fact that the future Bundeswehr will
have to carry out much greater designs than in Kosovo which was just the
test case for the things to come. The political party which most fervently supports this imperialist transformation is the Greens. Even Rudolf Scharping, the defence minister (of the Social Democrats) does not go as far as they do, and from his part gets proposals worked out in which conscription still holds a certain position. Trittin, though, of the Greens, yes, the so-called leftist Trittin, puts down his reserve and calls for the complete abolition of conscription. The Greens now are the part of the government which the most are in agreement with this "restructuring commission". Never before it has become as clear
as now how the policy which aims at functionalising the country for the
new imperialist intervention policy and to push through the corresponding
militarization, supplemented by the suffocation of the domestic industry,
100% fits the Greens and by no means is contradictory to their political
line. The criticism of this green and pacifist mendacious direction which
the Neue Einheit organization has conducted for 25 years, here more than
ever proves to be completely correct, whereas all other assessments prove
to be fundamentally wrong. It has once again to be stressed
that the anti-nuclear-energy policy, the hysteria, the "fear of the atom",
which in itself already is an absurdity, has been the largest manoeuvre of
political deceit of the past 25 years. In this way the largest leading
astray of people which formerly had been revolutionary-minded, has taken
place. In this way the revolutionary forces have been intimidated and
diverted, in this way the objective of dissolving the revolutionary
potentials in a country has been pursued. Now it becomes clear that the
campaign against nuclear energy plants and the call for "soft energy" can
very well go identic with the policy of international military
intervention, of intervention in foreign countries, the nuclear threat by
NATO and the use of uranium ammunition included, which already has been
put into practice. Hostile to the people, ultrareactionary to the bones - even a fascist current like the NPD would not be able to surpass that in the substance. This is the most rightist of the rightist stuff at all, and it cannot be otherwise because the basic content of the Greens, which we, in contrast to all the other organisations, have always been analyzing as such, dictates that in the end. A social democracy which indeed also in reality has made itself similar in many aspects to the Greens, in the end becomes identical with that. The coalition of the Social Democrats of Germany (SPD) and the Greens makes this policy, and it has still to be waited for if the conservatives will seriously obstruct it. If the German Chancellor Schroeder (SPD) declares that one will continue marching towards a "services society" and cutting down on the "classical industry", if friends of Schroeder declare that one will reduce industrial employment even much further, to 5%, and simultaneously the country is set on an aggressive course, then one should ask oneself where the unemployed produced in this way are to remain. They are to be put exactly into military projects, and in the crisis situation the professionals' army will not remain alone. They will be put into additional paramilitary units for the safety of the system. This might be the next step in the next larger crisis, maybe after 5 or 6 years. It is not possible for a society to take a stronger rightist turn. Not the name or the tag somebody is bearing is decisive, but the real economic-political meaning of his policy. Editorial staff of Neue Einheit
|