The real working class
demonstrations are on the 14th of April
Turkey once again witnessed
mass demonstrations on Monday (11-04-2001). During the march and meeting
organized in Ankara some 70 thousand people gathered and there was a fight
between the police and some of the demonstrators. More than 120 people
were taken to custody and around 200 were wounded including some policemen.
Although activists from some leftists groups participated, the following
facts openly characterizes the events as a reactionary middle-class attitude..
1. The demonstrations
were organized by the chamber of shopkeepers in Ankara.
2. The leader of the
chamber is a member the executive committee of the fascist party (MHP),
which is also one of the coalition parties.
3. The main group who
worked for gathering people for the demonstration is another fascist party
(BBP) that is now outside the parliament. One of its leaders who was responsible
for killing 400 people in Maras (many progressive people were killed in
a massacre organized by the fascists) before 1980 military coupe, Okkes
Sendiller led the marching.
4. The chamber's aim
is to "speed" the so-called economic reforms! The reforms are, as you
know, a full sale for Turkish economy to imperialist countries (privatization,
laws for attracting foreign capital etc.). If we combine this with BBP's
close relations with US, than every thing becomes more clear.
5. No working class organization
or leftist, revolutionary group or party openly declared that it would
participate the demonstration.
6. No banner or flag
or any sign about a class-based demand was witnessed.
7. The crowd shouted
islamic or fascist slogans.
8. The crowd attacked
some women who were not wearing islamic clothes.
9. The crowd attacked
a students hostel and chased girls.
10. There is clear evidence
that the security forces "wanted" some action.
a) They did not search
anybody who came for the demonstrations. In Turkey people are searched
at least twice in every mass meeting.
b) Trucks full of people
and stones were permitted to come inside the meeting area, which is impossible
in other meetings. All the roads that are near to the meeting area are
always closed to traffic.
c) Only 3200 police was
following the 70 thousand marching. In 1st of May last year, 23 thousand
policemen "escorted" 30 thousand demonstrators!
d) The chamber had decided
to organize the demonstration on the 18th of April. But the police chief
asked them to change the date to 11th of April.
11. Then, we have to
a) Because there will
be demonstrations organized by the trade unions, other working-class organizations,
left political parties on the 14th. Now they declared a ban on the demonstrations.
b) Because the big capital
and the imperialist countries need a pressure on the government to speed
up the "reforms" (and they succeeded, the laws which will have terrible
consequences for the working classes is passing through the parliament
Who are those people
who marched and had a fight with the police? Most of them are shop-keepers
and laborers who work for them. There are also jobless people among them.
Fascist and radical islamic organizations did always have a strong support
from these strata, which is not a surprise for the marxists. It is true
that the communists should also work to organize the small shop-keepers
especially who are becoming a part of the proletariat in crisis periods.
However, Turkish left has a priority to establish a more clear class-basis,
in order to attract those waving strata.
This is why, the demonstrations
which we will organize (regardless of the decision of the ruling classes
to ban it or not) on the 14th (Saturday) in many cities are very important.
And the communists will take their banners, slogans to the streets saying:
Down with IMF, stop the reforms", Yankee go home, No to EU, Down with
The Political Bureau
of Party for Socialist Power-Communist Party (SIP)
the correct estimation of the situation in Turkey?
is signalling that the resistance against these IMF programs comes from
the depth of the Turkish people itself. Alone from the fact that certain
representatives of rightist or even fascist parties take part in certain
leading bodies one cannot conclude that this is a characterizing element
of these demonstrations. Therefore one must not describe these demonstrations
as if they were staged in their essence by the persons mentioned. This
is the impression as far as we have it from abroad.
What do other Turkish organisations
think about this estimation?
Because of the position
of the Turkish economy in the international context it is unavoidable
and consequent that parts of the Turkish bourgeoisie and petty bourgeoisie
take part in this struggle and also initially become vocal. Rightly some
have pointed to the fact that in various struggles petty bourgeois people
initially took seize of the question and later let the proletariat come
to the fore as the real force which takes over the essential questions
in its own way.
Ed. staff of Neue
What do you
think about this matter? Send
us your opinion!